Also, thelondonpaper, that miserable stack of propaganda, is hoeing out anti-atheism again. So the Christians got offended by the atheist bus campaign and have shelled out money for an ad campaign which says 'There is definitely a God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.' This has been funded by three sects, the Russian Orthodoxes, the Catholics and I think the Baptists.
So, it's fine to completely confirm Christianity, but the merest sliver of an iota of assumption that there may be a chance of a god not existing (once again, the word 'probably' had to be added to the atheist bus campaign in order to be allowed) is slandered? They had to add 'probably', but it's okay to say that there 'definitely' is a god? And wouldn't the existence of a god be more worrying than the lack of one? thelondonpaper said that the atheist bus campaign 'offended believers' but the first line of its article said 'God works in mysterious ways, and he may use the buses to prove it'. So the very papers are run by fundies. Great.
I seriously considered writing into thelondonpaper to protest, but I've been reading through the columns and have confirmed that it's full of idiots. Feel free to email yourview@thelondonpaper.com if you'd like on my behalf.
OFF TO PARIS TOMORROW
1 people have seen the light.:
We're world famous for trash newspapers, this shoudln't be a surprise. The Guardian and The Times are both good (and supplement eachothers bias to give a good clear picture if you read both (because I'm a nerd and I stidy politics stfu)) as are a few others but anyone with sense won't trust the ample waves of trash newspapers we posess.
Also why the problem with the tube? Masses of people somewhat counteract CCTV anyway.
Not that you'd have much experience of masses of people coming from where you do :P
Post a Comment